Generative AI Resources for Instructors
The introduction of ChatGPT has sparked discussions in higher education about its use and the challenges and opportunities it presents for instructors in the classroom. As with any technology used in instruction, following best practices is key to success . As always, focusing on learning objectives and being transparent with students will continue to be key to quality teaching and learning. With generative AI, it is also paramount that instructors know what AI is and how it can be ethically used in preparation and instruction.
To access a free version of ChatGPT, visit OpenAI and set up your account.
How Can Instructors Use AI?
Instructional use of Generative AI in higher education courses will continue to evolve. Here are just a few common uses for AI in the classroom:
- Generate examples, demonstrations, alternate test questions, & discussion prompts
- Review written objectives, directions, & prompts
- Recommend additional resources
- Review structure of written materials
Getting Started: AI for Instruction
For further ideas on possibilities for AI use in preparation and instruction, as well as ways to address the topic with students and in your syllabi, visit Brandeis University's CTL resources here.
The articles listed below provide an overview of early generative AI use in higher education.
Johnson, SM, et.al. (2023). Teaching in the Age of AI. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching.
McMurtiie, B. and Beckie Supiano. (June 13, 2023). Caught Off Guard by AI. Chronicle of Higher Education.
McCormack, M. (April 2023). Adopting and Adapting to Generative AI in Higher Ed Tech. Educause.
Mittelstadt, M. (2023). ChatGPT Guidance for Instructors. University of Georgia Center for Teaching and Learning.
Syllabus Statement Examples & Considerations
As Generative AI continues to evolve, it is clear that "proof" of plagiarism is becoming more problematic. The Turnitin tool we have used before could directly compare student writing to websites, articles, and other writing; whereas, AI writing detection is less definitive. We in the Center for Teaching and Learning would reiterate a few of the points from Turnitin.com AI Writing Detection's own site: "Remember there is no 'right' or 'target' score with the AI writing indicator"; "Always dig deeper and analyze in conjunction with your institution's policies on the use of AI writing tools, in coordination with the assignment's rubric"; and "Engage with your student if you have doubts about the authenticity of the submission...use this [AI Writing Detection results] to have an honest, open dialogue with students regarding their work." Ultimately, your openness about your AI policies with students throughout the semester will be the best indicator as to how ethically your students use the tools in your class.
Suggested Mississippi State University Syllabus Statements: 3 Options
Option 1: Open Use Guidelines: Encourages student use of AI in assignments, with proper citation of AI assistance
AI Policy: Permitted in This Course with Attribution
In [course name], students are encouraged to use Generative AI Tools such as ChatGPT to support their work. Students must give credit and cite any AI-generated material according to rules of documentation including in-text citations, quotations, and references.
Students must also include the following statement in assignments to indicate use of a Generative AI Tool: "The author acknowledges the use of [Generative AI Tool Name] in the preparation of this assignment for [brainstorming, grammatical correction, citation, etc].
Option 2: Moderate Use Guidelines: Encourages AI use in specific assignments only. Students must disclose AI assistance and use proper citation.
AI Policy: Permitted When Assigned with Attribution
In [course name], students are permitted to use Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT for specific assignments, as designated by the instructor. Students must give credit and cite any AI-generated material according to [APA, MLA, etc.] rules, including in-text citations, quotations, and references. Submitted work may be filtered through an AI Writing Detection tool. This review may initiate further discussion about the authenticity of the submission which could result in a more formal review through the Honor Code Council.
Students must also include the following statement in assignments to indicate use of a Generative AI Tool: "The author acknowledges the use of [Generative AI Tool Name] in the preparation of this assignment for [brainstorming, grammatical correction, citation, etc].
Option 3: Strict Use Guidelines: Discourages AI use in course.
AI Policy: AI Use Discouraged in This Course
In [course name], it is expected that all submitted work is produced by students themselves. Use of a Generative AI tool to complete an assignment constitutes academic dishonesty and will be reported as an Honor Code Violation. Submitted work may be filtered through an AI Writing Detection tool. This review may initiate further discussion about the authenticity of the submission which could result in a more formal review through the Honor Code Council.